Why women failed to gain the vote between 1900 and 1914?

The wo workforces suffrage move ments were originaly from the United States during the 19th Century. In colonial America, as elsewhere(Austrialia and new zealand in the world particularly Britain, civil law did not recognize the equality of men and women. some(prenominal) men thought that many women were a waste and can never be good as men. During 1900 and 1914 a fair sex had no legal rights. A married womens belongings belonged to her husband, this included earnings as easily as totally her property and goods. in otherwise words she was like a mere objective lens in the mans hands.To todays standards this is comp permitely outrageous, in todays society women can expect to be treated exactly as the opposite sex when it comes to work and other things. This is abundant in the rise of popularity of womans football and female boxing. During the 1800, women were judge to be perfect in those days a perfect lady would be judge to bring forth a pale face, do absolutely no exercise and come very delicate constitution, they where expected to be good hostesses and certainly know their place in society. Women never even received the analogous level of education as men. ome women nerver even got eduction. They were considered as being too stupid for higher education. yet not all women where satisfied with their position in life.They believed that they were stuck in a vicious circle, which if not impossible, would be very difficult to break out of. The earlier years of the 20th centruary in Britian saw a concerted campaign for the right to vote for women. the womens social and political union, otherwise known as the suffragettes, was undercoated in 1903 by the Pankhurst family. he campaign for the right to vote for women betwixt 1905 and 1914 became increasingly militant as women were prompt to take engineer action, such as distruption of meetings, chaining themselves to railings outside 10 downing street, smashing windows and rioting. at bingle stage the prime minister,s country house was fire bombed. as a result of this many suffragettes found themselves inside holloway prison where they resorted to hungry strikes. the prison aouthorities responded with forcible feeding. in that location is no simple answer why the suffrage movement failed between 1900 and 1914, instead, a series of long and short term causes. The main level off of this essay is to analyze, as well as discuss these reasons in detail. If possible I will spew them in order of importance. women where treated very harshly in the 1900 as they were objects in front on mens eyes. when a woman got married all her belongings wer transfered to her husband and they were now the property of the husband. in other words married women were legally dead in the eyes of the law. omen had no property rights, all thier property was thier husbands. all women were robbed off thier self-confidence and self-respect and this made them totalyy dependent on men.No woman could get eduction since no college or university would accept women students but on that point were 1 or 2 exceptions. the women cute the vote becouse they cherished to be equaly nown in public as men. wanted there rights. wanted thier belongings. wanted to be rembered for somethin. wanted to have the right to vote and have a saying in the country. anted plenty to hear what they have to say about how the country is run. The Suffragists were called the shrieking sisterhood, branded as unfeminine, and accused of sinfulness and drunkenness. Many citizens and a great deal of newspapers where strongly against The National man and wife Of Womens Suffrage Societies. Suffragist leaders were much subjected to physical abuse. Suffragist meetings were repeatedly stormed and disrupted by street gangs. On many occasions the speaker at a suffragist meeting would hold a revolver to discourage possible attacks from the audience.However, it was not only men that were against the suffragist movement, many, if n ot most upper-class women were against the movement, including Queen Victoria. There were many reasons why anti-suffragists felt this way. The anti-suffragists partly establish their assumptions on the contravention between the male and female physical abilities they did not discuss the biological difference because they did not believe it was appropriate for public discussion. Instead, emphasis was entrap on the fragility of the women claiming that this is what made her unsuited for the vote.The physical flunk of the female would be potentially dangerous. They argues that assuming she reached the polling place, she might get caught up in a feud and given the womens natural fragility, she would be the atomic number 53 to get hurt. Beyond these reasons existed the belief that allowing women to vote would jeopardize the nations security measures and lead, ultimately, to war. One leader of the anti-suffragists said Allowing women to vote would lead to foreign aggression and war. The second areas of difference between men and women which the antis argued, was the surface of morality.A anti who spoke at a hearing in computerized tomography on womens suffrage observed that The most convincing reason I have heard was the one offered by Miss Pearson. We want the ballot, and we want it when we want it. This shows the depth of intelligence. The anti-suffragists also predicted that if women were given the vote bootleg results would occur. The antis believed that political involvement would put them in situations were the male vulnerability would be exploited. However, above all the anti-suffragists were afraid(p) about the emotional state of women.Men where described as rational and emotionally stable, women were portrayed as high strung, tense, irritable and irrational. One anti said that when women generally vote and hold office, the desire for publicity and love of the limelight will combine to produce a form of hysteria. Some took this idea promote and argued that since all women suffragists bordered on hysteria there was no need to take their arguments seriously. They said that when women vote, she would let her feelings rather then her intellectual concern be the main reasons for their voteSome more than freakish people said that allowing women to have the vote would breed a nation of transvestites and that women could hide extra voter turnout slips in their voluminous sleeves The position of certain key political parties was also a huge contributor to why women never got the vote between 1900 and 1914. For if women wanted the vote, ultimately if would have been the MPs that they would have had to convince. Many backbench imperfect tense MPs were supporters of votes for women, but the fine-looking leaders were opposed to it.This was because they feared that, if only better-off, property owning women got the vote, these women would vote for their arch rival, the Conservative political party. On the other hand, some conserv ative leaders, liking the prospect of more conservative voters, were quite keen on womens suffrage. But they took no action because their backbench MPs were completely opposed, on principle, to change the role of women. In addition, both parties had large worries then female suffrage. Neither party was prepared to adopt female suffrage as party policy, so it never got priority in parliament.In 1903, many suffragists where angry at the lack of achievement that had come their way, as a result, a lady called Mrs. Emmeline Pankhurst founded a new organization, which was called the Womens Social and Political Union or WSPU in short. The Daily Mail called then the suffragettes and with them making so many headlines this name became rough to shake off. The suffragettes had the same goal and ambitions as the suffragists, however, they believed that the only way to reach their goal was to become more radical and militant. The suffragettes disrupted political meeting and repeatedly harasse d ministers.Asquith, who at that time was a Liberal Prime Minister, came under particularly heavy abuse due to his views on women suffrage. they physically assulted politicans, destroyed paintings in the national gallery and in 1913 emily davison threw herself under the kings horse and was killed. there trigger-happy tactics may have lots support for the camaign. After a womens suffrage bill ran out of time in 1908, direct action from the suffragettes began. The suffragettes began making speeches at 10 Downing street, they even chained themselves to railing to stop being moved on, in doing so getting themselves arrested.In that same year stones where thrown thought the windows of 10 Downing street There was however logic behind the military force. The suffragettes believed that the government ignored the calls for women suffrage because there where more important issues. The Suffragettes believed that by becoming more radical and violent the government where forced to hark whethe r they liked it or not, they believed that processions and petitions, however large, were easily ignored. the goverment di not want to be seen to give in to the violent demandss as this would mak them look weak.There where mixed reactions to the Direct Action that the Suffragettes employed. Some people where worried, some sympathetic and some were scornful. It was the reaction from the Suffragists that surprised people the most. Many suffragists admired the readiness of suffragettes to go to jail for the cause. When the first suffragette was imprisoned, Mrs. Fawcett put on a banquet for them when they where released. This did not last, for as the Suffragettes got more violent and radical the further apart the two groups got, relationships between then become very strained.The suffragists believed that you cant win the right for a classless vote by using undemocratic methods, they also believed that the violence would put of the MPs that would have backed their cause. There is no d oubt that the increase in violence alienated the support for womans suffrage. By 1913 many suffragettes where imprisoned. The violence did however achieve one of its goals, it certainly raised the profile of the issue and it could not longer be ignored. But in doing so they damaged the bigger picture, for know there was a reason for their opponents for rejecting womans suffrage.If the MPs gave in to the violence from the suffragettes what hope will they have when dockers or mine workers riot for higher wages? From 1911 onwards, whenever the issue of womans suffrage was debated in parliament, there was a bigger majority against womens suffrage. In 1914 Britain declared war in Germany, from August to September many different womens organizations were set up, including the Womens Hospital Corp and the Womens Police Volunteers. This meant that all suffragist and suffragette campaigns had to be halted.I think that the most important reason for why the women suffrage was unsuccessful duri ng 1900 and the 1914 was the fact that, peoples minds at that time where not prepared for such a big advancement, it is true that the suffragettes reduced their chances significantly, but I believe that even if there was no violence the women would have still not got the vote until by and by the war becouse that is when they really proved themsleves as they helped out greatly in the first world war.